
I played at a table with “Dags” tonight at FTP. Usually I see John playing the $25/$50 NL tables where he buys-in for the maximum: $5,000. Today he was playing the $0.05/$0.10 NL tables where he bought in for the maximum: $10. That’s right, ten bucks. I couldn’t resist so I joined and also bought in for $10. The table was pretty loose as you’d expect for such low stakes online poker with a pro sitting at the table. My strategy was the same as it nearly always is at a loose nine-handed game. I’m going to play pretty tight, not take a lot of chances, but bet my good hands strongly. This is known as playing tight-aggressive. That’s not to say I won’t ever bluff, because I will if I think it will succeed. In fact, my tight table image will allow me to get away with more bluffs than a more loose player.
I’m “Skeezix”
I played a few small pots, but nothing major until I was dealt QQ. The following unfolded:
*** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Skeezix [Qd Qc] Skeezix raises to $0.75 tank34 calls $0.75 Xx Fist Full xX folds Mingmin12 folds John DAgostino calls $0.75 kazaf folds Dirtdog folds ScaryShari folds pokeropie folds *** FLOP *** [Th Qh 9c] Skeezix bets $2.40 tank34 calls $2.40 John DAgostino raises to $9.15, and is all in Skeezix calls $6.20, and is all in tank34 calls $6.50, and is all in John DAgostino shows [9d Jd] Skeezix shows [Qd Qc] tank34 shows [Jc Jh] Uncalled bet of $0.25 returned to John DAgostino *** TURN *** [Th Qh 9c] [Ks] *** RIVER *** [Th Qh 9c Ks] [8s] John DAgostino shows a straight, King high tank34 shows a straight, King high tank34 ties for the side pot ($0.30) with a straight, King high John DAgostino ties for the side pot ($0.30) with a straight, King high Skeezix shows three of a kind, Queens tank34 ties for the main pot ($13.40) with a straight, King high John DAgostino ties for the main pot ($13.40) with a straight, King high John DAgostino: pokah's fun Skeezix: nh WARBUCKS69 (Observer): lol John DAgostino: lucky Skeezix: i hated that flop Skeezix: too much texture tank34: yep very lucky Skeezix: but i'm not folding top set John DAgostino: i agree with ya
Carnage #1
I’ve learned the hard way that after losing a hand like that all you can do is say, “Hey, I got my money in with the best hand.” Keep making plays with a positive expected value, and you’ll come out ahead.
Holdem Hi: 903 enumerated boards containing 9c Qh Th cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Qc Qd 631 69.88 264 29.24 8 0.89 0.702 Jc Jh 38 4.21 632 69.99 233 25.80 0.170 Jd 9d 1 0.11 669 74.09 233 25.80 0.129
I bought another $10 in chips and kept playing. A few hands later I was dealt another pocket pair: 99 and this time just called. Everyone else wanted in since it was so cheap and then John tried to make a move to take down all that “dead money.” Given his position in the hand and the huge overbet, I felt he wasn’t that strong and I called:
*** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Skeezix [9c 9h] Dirtdog folds ScaryShari folds pokeropie folds Skeezix calls $0.10 tank34 calls $0.10 Valico calls $0.10 Mingmin12 folds John DAgostino: now im steamin John DAgostino raises to $13.85, and is all in AceRockJ folds Valico: haha Skeezix: hmm..alright, i'll gamble. Skeezix calls $9.75, and is all in John DAgostino: oh no tank34 folds Valico folds John DAgostino shows [9d Kh] Skeezix shows [9c 9h] Uncalled bet of $4 returned to John DAgostino *** FLOP *** [Qs 4s Ks] *** TURN *** [Qs 4s Ks] [7d] *** RIVER *** [Qs 4s Ks 7d] [Jd] John DAgostino shows a pair of Kings Skeezix shows a pair of Nines John DAgostino wins the pot ($19) with a pair of Kings Valico: ouch
I don’t have a screenshot of this one, but you get the idea. Again, I got my money in as about a 70% favorite and got outdrawn.
Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV 9c 9h 1166827 68.14 507034 29.61 38443 2.25 0.693 9d Kh 507034 29.61 1166827 68.14 38443 2.25 0.307
I’m not bitter, though. That’s poker. 7 times out of 10, I win those hands, but 3 times I lose. And regardless of the results, I enjoyed playing some all-in hands against jdags.
Tags: Poker
May 6th, 2006 at 2:30 pm
Forgive my ignorance, but what prevents a member of the poker-playing public from using a nickname that has meaning within poker circles. How is it any different to me going “/nick Jamin Philip Gray”?
I guess all I mean is, how do you know it was really him?
May 6th, 2006 at 3:18 pm
Good question.
For starters, it’s not like IRC where you can change nicks at whim. You pick a username when you sign up for the site, and you can’t change it. Secondly, the site I play on, FTP, specializes in making it clear when you’re playing a real pro. The tables they are on are highlighted in red, they have their own custom avatars. You can see John D’Agostino’s FTP profile here. They provide some info on this in their FAQ.
May 14th, 2006 at 11:42 am
I was perusing planet gnome last weekend and this blog entry peaked my interest in playing online for real money. I’ve been playing on free Hold’em sites for years, but I finally joined PokerStars last night.
In my first tournament (45-players, $10/$1 buy-in) I took 2nd place!
Here is a blog entry with pics:
http://www.jconnell.com/i686-poker-optimized/
May 14th, 2006 at 11:48 am
Congrats on the nice finish!